Follow-up Comment #8, bug #64592 (project groff):
Sorry, my fault, I was not clear. My reference to the registers in comment #3
was intended to show that your statement "registers .m and .M don't behave
like other registers (containing the default values)" was the problem. I'm not
sure (2) can be
Update of bug #64892 (project groff):
Severity: 3 - Normal => 2 - Minor
Item Group: Warning/Suspicious behaviour => Lint
Status:None => Need Info
___
Follow-up Comment #9, bug #64592 (project groff):
We could certainly change the `default_color` object to give it a non-empty
name. It doesn't seem like it should be a problem; the default color already
can't be redefined, so it's okay if it means different things for stroke and
fill.
There is a
Follow-up Comment #10, bug #64592 (project groff):
Except for updating documentation (and mom(7)), the change I mentioned in
comment #9 looks this easy.
diff --git a/src/libs/libgroff/color.cpp b/src/libs/libgroff/color.cpp
index 32a1bc8e7..8417c2074 100644
--- a/src/libs/libgroff/color.cpp
+++