[bug #64728] diversion widths reported when using eqn mark/lineup feature inconsistent with Heirloom

2023-10-10 Thread Dave
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #64728 (project groff): [comment #2 comment #2:] > The following example shows a diversion in which 'abc' is > printed, followed by a negative horizontal motion of the length > of the just printed. The reported diversion width is zero; the > expected width would be \w'abc

[bug #64728] diversion widths reported when using eqn mark/lineup feature inconsistent with Heirloom

2023-10-10 Thread Deri James
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #64728 (project groff): > Heirloom nroff reports the same zero width, so if this is indeed a bug, it's a widespread one. If you consider the width of a diversion is the horizontal displacement of the longest line in the diversion, then the horizontal displacement in thi

[bug #64728] diversion widths reported when using eqn mark/lineup feature inconsistent with Heirloom

2023-10-10 Thread Dave
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #64728 (project groff): [comment #4 comment #4:] > If you consider the width of a diversion is the horizontal > displacement of the longest line in the diversion, then the > horizontal displacement in this single line example is zero, True, and implementations do seem to