[bug #66675] valid .char definition provoking erroneous error

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #66675 (group groff): [comment #1 comment #1:] > \[u...] means an unicode character. It was permitted to mean other things for the past at least 20 years and I bet a lot longer. $ nroff --version GNU nroff (groff) version 1.19.2 $ printf '.char \[unhappy] :-(\nI feel \[

[bug #66675] valid .char definition provoking erroneous error

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #66675 (group groff): \[u...] means an unicode character. Use 'Unhappy' instead. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent

[bug #66675] valid .char definition provoking erroneous error

URL: Summary: valid .char definition provoking erroneous error Group: GNU roff Submitter: barx Submitted: Thu 16 Jan 2025 03:54:17 PM CST Category: Core Severi