[bug #66410] [mdoc] warning of .Lb usage without library definition excessive

2025-05-07 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Update of bug #66410 (group groff): Status: In Progress => Fixed Open/Closed:Open => Closed Planned Release:None => 1.24.0 ___ Follow-up Comment #6:

[bug #66410] [mdoc] warning of .Lb usage without library definition excessive

2025-05-02 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Update of bug #66410 (group groff): Status: Confirmed => In Progress Assigned to:None => gbranden ___ Reply to this item at: __

[bug #66410] [mdoc] warning of .Lb usage without library definition excessive

2025-03-27 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Update of bug #66410 (group groff): Status: Need Info => Confirmed ___ Follow-up Comment #5: Clearing "Need Info" status. Looks like we know what we need to do: stop throwing the warning. An _mdoc_ macro n

[bug #66410] [mdoc] warning of .Lb usage without library definition excessive

2024-11-14 Thread Dave
Update of bug #66410 (group groff): Summary: mdoc: warning of .Lb usage without library definition excessive => [mdoc] warning of .Lb usage without library definition excessive ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #66410] mdoc: warning of .Lb usage without library definition excessive

2024-11-13 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #66410 (group groff): Thank you very much for correcting my bogus history, Ingo. I apologize for misattributing another person's work to Cynthia Livingston. It seems to me that mdoc(7) could use a historical summary of the growth of its macro repertoire, similar to the

[bug #66410] mdoc: warning of .Lb usage without library definition excessive

2024-11-13 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #66410 (group groff): gbranden: > At the time mdoc was designed, it seems that purpose This part of your argument is bogus. The .Lb macro did not exist when mdoc was designed. It did not even exist in the 4.4BSD-Lite2 (June 1995) version of mdoc(7). It has nothing to do

[bug #66410] mdoc: warning of .Lb usage without library definition excessive

2024-11-09 Thread Andrew Bower
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #66410 (group groff): Hi, [comment #1 comment #1:] > [comment #0 original submission:] > > In my opinion, the `Lb` _mdoc_ feature is not properly orthogonalized. Thanks for the explanation. I suspect you are right! >> Could this warning perhaps be restricted to use of

[bug #66410] mdoc: warning of .Lb usage without library definition excessive

2024-11-06 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Update of bug #66410 (group groff): Status:None => Need Info ___ Follow-up Comment #1: [comment #0 original submission:] > If the .Lb macro is used without a corresponding library definition present >

[bug #66410] mdoc: warning of .Lb usage without library definition excessive

2024-11-05 Thread anonymous
URL: Summary: mdoc: warning of .Lb usage without library definition excessive Group: GNU roff Submitter: None Submitted: Tue 05 Nov 2024 09:36:30 PM UTC Category: Macro packag