[bug #65190] [man, mdoc] revise implementation of continuous rendering mode

Update of bug #65190 (group groff): Status: In Progress => Fixed Open/Closed:Open => Closed Planned Release:None => 1.24.0 ___ Follow-up Comment #9:

[bug #65190] [man, mdoc] revise implementation of continuous rendering mode

Update of bug #65190 (group groff): Status: Confirmed => In Progress ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via Sav

[bug #65190] [man, mdoc] revise implementation of continuous rendering mode

Follow-up Comment #8, bug#65190 (group groff): [comment #6 comment #6:] > I've heard no demand expressed for continuously rendered > ms/me/mm/mom documents. Less self-serving instances: * http://lists.gnu.org/r/groff/2006-05/msg00102.html * http://lists.gnu.org/r/groff/2008-03/msg00012.html * htt

[bug #65190] [man, mdoc] revise implementation of continuous rendering mode

Follow-up Comment #7, bug#65190 (group groff): [comment #6 comment #6:] > I've heard no demand expressed for continuously rendered > ms/me/mm/mom documents. The act of filing #61453 might be said to constitute demand. ;-) Granted, for me it's low priority: I have a solution that works, albeit on

[bug #65190] [man, mdoc] revise implementation of continuous rendering mode

Follow-up Comment #6, bug#65190 (group groff): Hi Dave, [comment #5 comment #5:] > Those steps will solve the problem in the man/mdoc domain. Right. > Which is maybe all you care about for now. It is an easier problem. For now, yes, because this is a problem that is provoking user complaints

[bug #65190] [man, mdoc] revise implementation of continuous rendering mode

Follow-up Comment #5, bug#65190 (group groff): Those steps will solve the problem in the man/mdoc domain. Which is maybe all you care about for now. It is an easier problem. My point is that bug #61453 is looking for a general solution for continuous rendering that works for all nroff output --

[bug #65190] [man, mdoc] revise implementation of continuous rendering mode

Follow-up Comment #4, bug#65190 (group groff): Hi Dave, [comment #3 comment #3:] > This seems like a specific case of the general enhancement bug #61453 seeks. Possibly we could do some ticket merging here (a manual process involving "closing" as "duplicate", adding cross references in both dire

[bug #65190] [man, mdoc] revise implementation of continuous rendering mode

Follow-up Comment #3, bug#65190 (group groff): This seems like a specific case of the general enhancement bug #61453 seeks. ___ Reply to this item at: _

[bug #65190] [man, mdoc] revise implementation of continuous rendering mode

Follow-up Comment #2, bug#65190 (group groff): Hi Bjarni, [comment #1 comment #1:] > The examples "lsp-help.1" and "lsp-help.broken.1" render OK > with the patch in bug #63960, which I installed in my repository > at that time. In my opinion, that's a hack. It extends the page length by one t

[bug #65190] [man, mdoc] revise implementation of continuous rendering mode

Follow-up Comment #1, bug#65190 (group groff): The examples "lsp-help.1" and "lsp-help.broken.1" render OK with the patch in bug #63960, which I installed in my repository at that time. ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #65190] [man, mdoc] revise implementation of continuous rendering mode

Update of bug#65190 (group groff): Depends on: => bugs #63587 ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message s

[bug #65190] [man, mdoc] revise implementation of continuous rendering mode

URL: Summary: [man,mdoc] revise implementation of continuous rendering mode Group: GNU roff Submitter: gbranden Submitted: Mon 22 Jan 2024 08:25:59 PM UTC Category: Macro - ot