[bug #65097] gropdf: one 'ps:' tag is now not processed

Follow-up Comment #5, bug#65097 (group groff): I have added this to my version of "gropdf": elsif ($par=~m/exec decornone/) { # skip processing } elsif ($par=~m/exec 0 setlinejoin/) { # skip processing, alre

[bug #65097] gropdf: one 'ps:' tag is now not processed

Update of bug#65097 (group groff): Status: Need Info => Invalid Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #4: Yes. Bjarni's else claus

[bug #65097] gropdf: one 'ps:' tag is now not processed

Update of bug#65097 (group groff): Status:None => Need Info ___ Follow-up Comment #3: Deri, is this ticket invalid? ___ Reply to

[bug #65097] gropdf: one 'ps:' tag is now not processed

Update of bug#65097 (group groff): Assigned to:None => deri ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message s

[bug #65097] gropdf: one 'ps:' tag is now not processed

Follow-up Comment #2, bug#65097 (group groff): [comment #1 comment #1:] > If I look at the output produced by:- > > pdfmom ../doc/automake.mom -P-d | less > > I can see:- > % x X ps: exec 0 setlinejoin > %% V12000 > 0 j > % V12000 > % H72000 > % x X ps: exec 0 setlinecap > %% wh2500 > 0 J Der

[bug #65097] gropdf: one 'ps:' tag is now not processed

Follow-up Comment #1, bug#65097 (group groff): If I look at the output produced by:- pdfmom ../doc/automake.mom -P-d | less I can see:- % x X ps: exec 0 setlinejoin %% V12000 0 j % V12000 % H72000 % x X ps: exec 0 setlinecap %% wh2500 0 J So the "0 j" has been emitted in response to the 0 setl

[bug #65097] gropdf: one 'ps:' tag is now not processed

URL: Summary: gropdf: one 'ps:' tag is now not processed Group: GNU roff Submitter: bjarniig Submitted: Sat 30 Dec 2023 07:20:51 PM UTC Category: Driver gropdf