[bug #64236] [eqn] "digit" type seems to have a bad name

2023-06-23 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #64236 (project groff): This seems likely entangled with bug #64231 and bug #64232. At this point I envision revamping the style (as opposed to the spacing) types. upright (currently "digit") slanted (currently "letter") heavy (currently nonexistent) ___

[bug #64236] [eqn] "digit" type seems to have a bad name

2023-05-22 Thread G. Branden Robinson
URL: Summary: [eqn] "digit" type seems to have a bad name Group: GNU roff Submitter: gbranden Submitted: Mon 22 May 2023 01:56:49 PM UTC Category: Preprocessor eqn