Follow-up Comment #9, bug#62921 (group groff):
[comment #8 comment #8:]
> Thanks (to whoever that anonymous submitter was ;-) )!
You've probably deduced this, but the reason I sometimes file groff bugs
"anonymously" is not to evade credit/blame, but so that I'm not forever tied
to a bug I have no
Follow-up Comment #8, bug#62921 (group groff):
[comment #7 comment #7:]
> [comment #1 comment #1:]
> > groff's _ms_ and _me_ have support for bold-italic already (and have
> > for decades), and it wouldn't be hard to add it to our _mm_ either;
>
> This has been filed as bug #65241.
Thanks (to wh
Follow-up Comment #7, bug#62921 (group groff):
[comment #1 comment #1:]
> groff's _ms_ and _me_ have support for bold-italic already (and have
> for decades), and it wouldn't be hard to add it to our _mm_ either;
This has been filed as bug #65241.
[comment #5 comment #5:]
> Ideally, distributors
Update of bug#62921 (group groff):
Status: Need Info => None
___
Follow-up Comment #6:
This bug was put into Need Info status with comment #1, which asked for
feedback that the submitter s
On 21.08.22 06:46, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #62921 (project groff):
[comment #4 comment #4:]
hi branden (and "person X" ;)),
chiming in again if I may.
Hi, original submitter here. Yes, your solution would be fine, but I'm a bit
confused. For groff 1.22.4 i
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #62921 (project groff):
[comment #4 comment #4:]
> Hi, original submitter here. Yes, your solution would be fine, but I'm a bit
confused. For groff 1.22.4 in Fedora 36 I noticed there are 3 *.pfa_ files in
/usr/share/groff/1.22.4/font/devps/: freeeuro.pfa_, symbolsl.pfa_
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #62921 (project groff):
[comment #1 comment #1:]
> The main practical problem here is that while we could certainly generate
_groff_ font descriptions file for some or all of those, and ship them, users
_still_ won't get those fonts in the output they generate unless the
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #62921 (project groff):
Hi Joerg,
[comment #2 comment #2:]
> I concur that this (an nice monospaced font) would be desirable.
>
> begin-off-topic: PTMono is a _very_ nice free monspaced font. extremely
readable on screen. use it as my standard font in the terminal. PTSe
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #62921 (project groff):
I concur that this (an nice monospaced font) would be desirable.
begin-off-topic: PTMono is a _very_ nice free monspaced font. extremely
readable on screen. use it as my standard font in the terminal. PTSerif and
PTsans are also very decent (and I
Update of bug #62921 (project groff):
Status:None => Need Info
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
[comment #0 original submission:]
> By default groff comes with 6 proportional fonts (Avant Garde,
Update of bug #62921 (project groff):
Severity: 3 - Normal => 1 - Wish
Summary: [Request] Add another monospaced font to the default
fonts => want another monospaced font in the default set
_
11 matches
Mail list logo
