[bug #59920] [PATCH] [me] documentation terminology cleanup

Update of bug #59920 (project groff): Status: In Progress => Fixed Open/Closed:Open => Closed Planned Release:None => 1.23.0

[bug #59920] [PATCH] [me] documentation terminology cleanup

Follow-up Comment #9, bug #59920 (project groff): I emailed Ingo's analysis to my French friend, and she replied to the email but didn't address its substance, which I can only take as tacit agreement with him. Since Ingo gives a rationale and cites sources, I think it's best to go with his wordi

[bug #59920] [PATCH] [me] documentation terminology cleanup

Follow-up Comment #8, bug #59920 (project groff): Ingo sent some comments about the translation, but not to the bug. So I might leave this open even after pushing the pending commit until we can get someone with impenetrable confidence in their French to supply corrections and sign off on the tra

[bug #59920] [PATCH] [me] documentation terminology cleanup

Follow-up Comment #7, bug #59920 (project groff): Hi Dave, I'm going with your alternate patch. I trust your Francophone friend, and the translation can always be further improved in the future when a willing volunteer appears. :) ___ Re

[bug #59920] [PATCH] [me] documentation terminology cleanup

Update of bug #59920 (project groff): Status: Need Info => In Progress ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Mess

[bug #59920] [PATCH] [me] documentation terminology cleanup

Update of bug #59920 (project groff): Summary: [PATCH] -me documentation terminology cleanup => [PATCH] [me] documentation terminology cleanup ___ Reply to this item at: _

[bug #59920] [PATCH] -me documentation terminology cleanup

Additional Item Attachment, bug #59920 (project groff): File name: 59920.fr.alternate.patch Size:0 KB ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #59920] [PATCH] -me documentation terminology cleanup

Follow-up Comment #6, bug #59920 (project groff): I asked a French-speaking friend about the changes I proposed in comment #3, and she concurred with them, so I've put them into the attached 59920.fr.minimal.patch. Besides the changes needed to synchronize with the updated English document, she a

[bug #59920] [PATCH] -me documentation terminology cleanup

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #59920 (project groff): [comment #4 comment #4:] > Not sure why this was marked "Fixed" and "1.23.0". My bad, I reopened it but didn't update those fields. ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #59920] [PATCH] -me documentation terminology cleanup

Update of bug #59920 (project groff): Status: Fixed => Need Info Planned Release: 1.23.0 => None ___ Follow-up Comment #4: Not sure why this was

[bug #59920] [PATCH] -me documentation terminology cleanup

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #59920 (project groff): The first change to doc/meintro_fr.me will be in the chunk of text added in commit 7ad6964d . Specifically, the lines utilisez la macro .b .bl should refer to .bl as a request rat

[bug #59920] [PATCH] -me documentation terminology cleanup

Update of bug #59920 (project groff): Open/Closed: Closed => Open ___ Follow-up Comment #2: Ugh, I forgot meintro.me has a French translation. The two wording changes will need to be made t

[bug #59920] [PATCH] -me documentation terminology cleanup

Update of bug #59920 (project groff): Status: In Progress => Fixed Open/Closed:Open => Closed Planned Release:None => 1.23.0

[bug #59920] [PATCH] -me documentation terminology cleanup

Update of bug #59920 (project groff): Status:None => In Progress Assigned to:None => gbranden ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #59920] [PATCH] -me documentation terminology cleanup

URL: Summary: [PATCH] -me documentation terminology cleanup Project: GNU troff Submitted by: barx Submitted on: Wed 20 Jan 2021 09:57:34 PM CST Category: Macro - me Se