[bug #59434] doc/groff.texi: document .if / .ie interaction more clearly

Update of bug #59434 (group groff): Status:None => Need Info Assigned to:None => barx ___ Follow-up Comment #6: Waiting on Dave to find

[bug #59434] doc/groff.texi: document .if / .ie interaction more clearly

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #59434 (group groff): [comment #4 comment #4:] > I guess we should get our terminology straight. > > For the infamous [comment #0 original submission] sample code, if COND1 is false, groff emits the .el warning. Do you consider this warning spurious? Yes. Since at the

[bug #59434] doc/groff.texi: document .if / .ie interaction more clearly

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #59434 (group groff): I guess we should get our terminology straight. For the infamous [comment #0 original submission] sample code, if COND1 is false, groff emits the .el warning. Do you consider this warning spurious? Based on everything written on this so far, I'm i

[bug #59434] doc/groff.texi: document .if / .ie interaction more clearly

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #59434 (group groff): [comment #0 original submission:] > Consensus on the email list (thread starting at http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2020-09/msg0.html) I'm afraid I have to depart from this consensus, given recent study in this area; see bug #45502 and

[bug #59434] doc/groff.texi: document .if / .ie interaction more clearly

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #59434 (project groff): See also bug #60260 ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.o

[bug #59434] doc/groff.texi: document .if / .ie interaction more clearly

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #59434 (project groff): This code is invalid (the term "legal" in this connection is inappropriate, see "GNU standards" and the (real) translations of the term in "*.po" files). The scope of ".if" is here two lines not one. This example is a demonstration of what

[bug #59434] doc/groff.texi: document .if / .ie interaction more clearly

URL: Summary: doc/groff.texi: document .if / .ie interaction more clearly Project: GNU troff Submitted by: barx Submitted on: Mon 09 Nov 2020 06:00:57 AM CST Category: Core