In egrep (grep 3.0), the order of options (multiple --include and --exclude),
is surprisingly significant.
I was puzzled by 5 extra output lines in my first egrep,
so I did another egrep, with the --include moved up front.
Known bug?
Yes, I realize that the include by itself would have been suffic
On 10/3/20 12:00 PM, John Ruckstuhl wrote:
In egrep (grep 3.0), the order of options (multiple --include and --exclude),
is surprisingly significant.
I was puzzled by 5 extra output lines in my first egrep,
so I did another egrep, with the --include moved up front.
That's expected behavior, bu
