On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:04 PM Norihiro Tanaka wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:25:06 -0700
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> > Oh! Good timing. I was about to make a new snapshot.
> > Do you happen to have a test case handy that demonstrates the failure?
>
> I added test case to previous patch.
>
> By t
On 9/26/20 1:48 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
As far as I can see, this patch is not necessary (also, I could not
reproduce your abort), so I'm closing this issue. Please reopen if you
can demonstrate its utility.
When I looked into it last week, I did the same thing with an assert with the
same res
On Sat, 26 Sep 2020 18:12:37 -0700
Paul Eggert wrote:
> The patch should be harmless (though this fact isn't trivial) and I can
> see it being useful for plausible future performance improvements, so it
> would make sense to install it after the next release.
No longer need the patch.
This bu
