bug#40634: Massive pattern list handling with -E format seems very slow since 2.28.

2020-09-11 Thread Jim Meyering
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 4:10 AM Norihiro Tanaka wrote: > On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 07:41:49 +0900 > Norihiro Tanaka wrote: > > On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 00:22:26 +0900 > > Norihiro Tanaka wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:24:42 +0900 > > > Norihiro Tanaka wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 17

bug#40634: Massive pattern list handling with -E format seems very slow since 2.28.

2020-09-11 Thread Jim Meyering
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 2:47 PM Jim Meyering wrote: > On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 4:10 AM Norihiro Tanaka wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 07:41:49 +0900 > > Norihiro Tanaka wrote: > > > On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 00:22:26 +0900 > > > Norihiro Tanaka wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:24:42

bug#43040: grep 3.4: memory leak

2020-09-11 Thread Paul Eggert
On 9/7/20 11:18 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote: Thanks, Paul! I can confirm that the latest git master version of gnu grep (which incorporates the patches) is faster than 3.4. Thanks for checking; closing the bug report.

bug#40634: Massive pattern list handling with -E format seems very slow since 2.28.

2020-09-11 Thread Paul Eggert
And here is the adjusted patch: Hold on, that looks like a cleanup of the April 18 patch posted here: https://bugs.gnu.org/40634#26 But there's a later patch dated April 19, which Norihiro Tanaka said should be more correct and simpler: https://bugs.gnu.org/40634#32 I'll try to take a look

bug#40634: Massive pattern list handling with -E format seems very slow since 2.28.

2020-09-11 Thread Jim Meyering
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 1:01 AM Paul Eggert wrote: > > And here is the adjusted patch: > > Hold on, that looks like a cleanup of the April 18 patch posted here: > > https://bugs.gnu.org/40634#26 > > But there's a later patch dated April 19, which Norihiro Tanaka said should be > more correct and s