If I may beg to differ, I see no reason that GNULIB can't be
ahead of GLIBC. In particular for the benefit of programs that use
it, like grep/sed/gawk.
If necessary, I can copy/paste the change from the bug report, but
it'd be nicer if you'd just push it to GNULIB.
Thanks,
Arnold
Paul Eggert w
On 1/22/19 12:44 AM, arn...@skeeve.com wrote:
If I may beg to differ, I see no reason that GNULIB can't be
ahead of GLIBC.
The only reason is avoiding hassle: I'd have to decouple this gnulib
file from glibc now (which requires changing some other administrative
file), and then recouple it late
Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 1/22/19 12:44 AM, arn...@skeeve.com wrote:
> > If I may beg to differ, I see no reason that GNULIB can't be
> > ahead of GLIBC.
> The only reason is avoiding hassle: I'd have to decouple this gnulib
> file from glibc now (which requires changing some other administrative
