Zoltán Herczeg wrote:
Just consider these two examples, where \x9c is an incorrectly encoded unicode
codepoint:
/(?<=\x9c)#/
Does it match \xd5\x9c# starting from #?
No, because the input does not contain a \x9c encoding error. Encoding errors
match only themselves, not parts of other cha
Hi,
this is a very interesting discussion.
>> /(?<=\x9c)#/
>>
>> Does it match \xd5\x9c# starting from #?
>
>No, because the input does not contain a \x9c encoding error. Encoding errors
>match only themselves, not parts of other characters. That is how the glibc
>matchers behave, and it's wh
On 09/26/2014 11:04 AM, Zoltán Herczeg wrote:
this is a very interesting discussion.
Yes, I have a lot of other things I'm *supposed* to be doing, but this
thread is more fun
/(?<=\x9c)#/
Does it match \xd5\x9c# starting from #?
No, because the input does not contain a \x9c encoding e
