Re: grep-2.5.4-20090203 compilation issues

2009-03-09 Thread Reuben Thomas
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Brian Egge wrote: I removed the three 'return' statements from search.c on lines 284, 289, 294. To get the tests to pass, I changed 'echo -n' to printf. FWIW, Sun recommends printf in preference to echo - see http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/805-3172/6j31br5bp?a=view. Thi

grep-2.5.4-20090203 compilation issues

2009-03-08 Thread Brian Egge
Thanks to the previous comments on the list I was able to get 2.5.4 compiled for Solaris 10 AMD64, 64-bit using Sun C 5.8. I removed the three 'return' statements from search.c on lines 284, 289, 294. To get the tests to pass, I changed 'echo -n' to printf. FWIW, Sun recommends printf in prefer

Re: grep-2.5.4-20090203 compilation issues

2009-02-09 Thread Karl Berry
As for these errors: > "search.c", line 284: void function cannot return value > "search.c", line 289: void function cannot return value > "search.c", line 294: void function cannot return value Line 284 is: return GEAcompile (pattern, size, Where GEAcompile is defined condit

Re: grep-2.5.4-20090203 compilation issues

2009-02-07 Thread Tony Abou-Assaleh
Hi Nelson, Many thanks for the extensive tests the detailed report. Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote: > I've just completed test builds of grep-2.5.4-20090203 in about 25 > Unix environments. While most succeeded and passed their tests, there > are some consistent failures of tests on some systems, nota

grep-2.5.4-20090203 compilation issues

2009-02-06 Thread Nelson H. F. Beebe
I've just completed test builds of grep-2.5.4-20090203 in about 25 Unix environments. While most succeeded and passed their tests, there are some consistent failures of tests on some systems, notably Sun Solaris on SPARC and IA-32/EM64T/AMD64. Compilations report anomalies like these: Ma