2015-11-09 17:00:36 +0100, Valerio Bozzolan:
> Thanks for agreeing with the evolution of the meaning of "-o".
>
> Just to make you a laugh: I was reproducing egrep with $BASH_REMATCH:
> https://gist.github.com/valerio-bozzolan/6787675e931dce1ba7e9
>
> Definitely not beautiful... but really effect
Thanks for agreeing with the evolution of the meaning of "-o".
Just to make you a laugh: I was reproducing egrep with $BASH_REMATCH:
https://gist.github.com/valerio-bozzolan/6787675e931dce1ba7e9
Definitely not beautiful... but really effective for me.
So something like "egrep -o $n regex" also c
2015-11-08 21:49:03 +0100, Valerio Bozzolan:
> Sorry... typo...
>
> echo abcde | grep -o -E 'b([a-z])d'
> => "bcd"
>
> Can't I choose to have only "c"?
[...]
That's correct, GNU grep doesn't have that capability (yet).
Recent versions of pcregrep do:
$ echo abc | pcregrep -o1 '.(.).'
b
Sorry... typo...
echo abcde | grep -o -E 'b([a-z])d'
=> "bcd"
Can't I choose to have only "c"?
Thanks again!
On 8 November 2015 21:42:44 CET, Valerio Bozzolan
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>(First time in a GNU mailing list!)
>
>I've already asked this question to my local GNU/Linux user group and
>i
Hi,
(First time in a GNU mailing list!)
I've already asked this question to my local GNU/Linux user group and in
#grep@Freenode... I'm still confused.
GNU Grep don't have an arg to choose the subexpression. Right?
Stupid e.g.:
echo abcde | grep -o -E 'b([a-z])d'
=> "bcd"
What if I wan
