[bug #28329] egrep/fgrep should accept respectively -E/-F

2009-12-18 Thread Tim H
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #28329 (project grep): > I think setting -E in GREP_OPTIONS is an incredibly bad idea > :-) as it will break scripts. Since extended REs are almost completely backward compatible with simple REs, I think it is unlikely that this will break many scripts. I haven't found

[bug #28329] egrep/fgrep should accept respectively -E/-F

2009-12-18 Thread Karl Berry
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #28329 (project grep): Irrelevant to the ticket, but FWIW, I use GREP_OPTIONS to do excludes: --directories=skip --exclude-dir=.svn --exclude=*~ The only problem I've had is with older greps that don't have the options. So it goes. ___

[bug #28329] egrep/fgrep should accept respectively -E/-F

2009-12-18 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Update of bug #28329 (project grep): Severity: 3 - Normal => 2 - Minor Summary: egrep error when GREP_OPTIONS=-E => egrep/fgrep should accept respectively -E/-F ___ Follow-up Comm