RE: source(builtin) and read(2)

2007-03-26 Thread Schwarz, Konrad
> -Original Message- > From: Eric Blake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Again, if your ssize_t is smaller than 32 bits, your > platform has > > other issues. Just because POSIX allows ssize_t to be > as small as > > 16 bits doesn't mean many modern platforms do that. While

RE: source(builtin) and read(2)

2007-03-26 Thread Schwarz, Konrad
> -Original Message- > From: Clive D.W. Feather [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > While we're at it, I would be interested in the rational > for "inventing" > > ssize_t and not using ptrdiff_t instead, if anyone would care to > > comment. > > size_t has to be able to hold the size of the la

RE: source(builtin) and read(2)

2007-04-03 Thread Schwarz, Konrad
> -Original Message- > From: Geoff Clare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 10:22 AM > To: bug-gnulib; Matthew Woehlke; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: source(builtin) and read(2) > I'll submit a defect report. Perhaps it would be possible to typedef ssize_t to ptr

RE: source(builtin) and read(2)

2007-04-03 Thread Schwarz, Konrad
> -Original Message- > From: Paul Eggert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Schwarz, Konrad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The argument that since ptrdiff_t is intended to represent the > > difference of pointers makes it somehow unsuitable to r