I noticed that there are items in the `Patch Manager' and `Tech
Support Manager' web interfaces under
https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnulib. I suspect these aren't
read, and you might want to turn off those forums (or whatever they're
called). Apologies if that's a bad guess.
I was looking th
Gnulib routines call `error', and on a non-glibc system that's likely
to use an uninitialized `program_name' since the variable is
initialized in progname.c, and that's not required. Users probably
won't find out about it until `error' gets called at some stage and
prints junk; if gnulib supports
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Under the current approach, it's the caller's responsibility to arrange
> for a program_name variable that works, either by using the progname
> module, or by rolling their own program_name variable.
So gnulib shouldn't be used for libraries (or at least
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If we put a similar declaration in
> error.c, it would cause two different definitions of program_name, and
> some non-Unix linkers reject this. (The C Standard allows them to
> reject it.)
Sorry, I thought Unix linkers actually did reject it, which was
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Perhaps we could change progname.h so that 'program_name' is a
> function that returns the program name, instead of being a global
> variable.
If it's any help, I can tell you what libroken does; I suspect it's
emulating a BSD facility. (In case you don'
dirname.h includes stdbool.h but the dirname module is missing a
Depends-on for it.
___
bug-gnulib mailing list
bug-gnulib@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
gnulib-tool sucked in xmalloc from something else and that failed to
build because xalloc-die was missing. This fixed it:
--- xalloc.~1.15.~ Sat Apr 16 22:19:07 2005
+++ xalloc Mon May 9 10:50:13 2005
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
m4/xalloc.m4
Depends-on:
+xalloc-die
configure.ac:
gl_XALLOC
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I omitted stdbool on the theory that packages that to assume C99 don't
> need to use the stdbool module, since stdbool.h comes with C99.
For what it's worth, this wasn't a package assuming c99. I think it
was a result of including something that autoscan
I noticed this, though it didn't seem to confuse gnulib-tool when it
got used.
--- moodules/stat-macros.~1.1.~ Tue Mar 22 07:43:56 2005
+++ moodules/stat-macrosMon May 9 11:21:01 2005
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
m4/stat-macros.m4
Depends-on:
-stat-macros
configure.ac:
gl_STAT_MACROS
___