On Sun, 2024-07-21 at 02:49 +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> You wrote on 2024-06-28:
> > There are some proposed changes [1] to track finer-grained timestamps in
> > the Linux kernel that will break the assumptions that nap() uses to
> > gauge the delay. In particular, writing to a file
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for the info.
> Unfortunately, these patches aren't in rawhide kernels yet. Christian
> will pull these into his tree once the dust settles from the merge
> window. Once that happens, it should go into rawhide soon after.
Can you please ping me when this happens or is about to ha
On Mon, 2024-07-22 at 13:19 +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Thanks for the info.
>
> > Unfortunately, these patches aren't in rawhide kernels yet. Christian
> > will pull these into his tree once the dust settles from the merge
> > window. Once that happens, it should go into rawhide so
When looking at the test-suite.log of a directory with gnulib tests
(whether from a testdir or included in a GNU package), the skipped tests
in this log files are more annoying than useful.
This patch omits the logs of the skipped tests, assuming Automake ≥ 1.17
is in use. It has no effect with Au
On Mon, 2024-07-22 at 13:19 +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Thanks for the info.
>
> > Unfortunately, these patches aren't in rawhide kernels yet. Christian
> > will pull these into his tree once the dust settles from the merge
> > window. Once that happens, it should go into rawhide so
Adding a few tests based on longstanding POSIX specification (i.e. not
added in 2024).
* AF_UNSPEC should be 0.
* All supported AF_* constants must have distinct values.
* SHUT_RD, SHUT_RDWR, SHUT_WR must have distinct values.
Gnulib doesn't guarantee this but it would be good to know if a platfo
This has nothing to do with gnulib.
Wrong mailing list.
Bruno
