Re: [PATCH 5/6] fts: three levels of leaf optimization

2018-04-05 Thread Kamil Dudka
On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 9:28:05 AM CEST Paul Eggert wrote: > * lib/fts.c (enum leaf_optimization): New type with three values. > (S_MAGIC_AFS): New macro. Sort them. > (leaf_optimization): Rename from leaf_optimization_applies, and > return enum leaf_optimization instead of bool. All uses chang

Re: [PATCH 5/6] fts: three levels of leaf optimization

2018-04-05 Thread Jim Meyering
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: > * lib/fts.c (enum leaf_optimization): New type with three values. > (S_MAGIC_AFS): New macro. Sort them. > (leaf_optimization): Rename from leaf_optimization_applies, and > return enum leaf_optimization instead of bool. All uses changed. > A

Re: [PATCH 5/6] fts: three levels of leaf optimization

2018-04-05 Thread Paul Eggert
On 04/05/2018 05:44 AM, Kamil Dudka wrote: Does this change (intentionally?) enable leaf optimization for CIFS? No, I wasn't thinking about CIFS when I wrote that. Thanks for reporting it. I installed the attached to try to fix this. I have not tested it with CIFS. >From 900451bc165c6747a82

Re: [PATCH 5/6] fts: three levels of leaf optimization

2018-04-05 Thread Paul Eggert
On 04/05/2018 08:34 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: Did you already post the other 5 patches in the series implied by the subject's "5/6"? Yes, in the thread starting here: https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-gnulib/2017-07/msg00119.html which Kamil was replying to.

Re: [PATCH 5/6] fts: three levels of leaf optimization

2018-04-05 Thread Bernhard Voelker
CCing bug-findutils. original post https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-gnulib/2018-04/msg00015.html On 04/05/2018 02:44 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote: > We have a bug report where find aborts while traversing a CIFS file system > mounted on a directory on an XFS file system. To the GNU findutils people: Redhat/