Re: bug#14463: coreutils-8.21 darwin regressions

2013-11-13 Thread Paul Eggert
Thanks, I pushed the following patch to gnulib. It should be incorporated automatically into the next version of coreutils so I'm marking the bug as done. diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 59de3e5..aae8c64 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2013-11-13 Paul Eggert +

Re: tight-scope check confusion

2013-11-13 Thread Reuben Thomas
On 11 November 2013 14:30, Jim Meyering wrote: > Glad you found it. > If you can find a good way to document it, I'd appreciate a patch. > I can think of nothing better than a note in the source, by whoever wrote it, so it reflects their intention rather than my half-baked guesses. -- http://

Re: tight-scope check confusion

2013-11-13 Thread Jim Meyering
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Reuben Thomas wrote: > On 11 November 2013 14:30, Jim Meyering wrote: >> >> Glad you found it. >> If you can find a good way to document it, I'd appreciate a patch. > > > I can think of nothing better than a note in the source, by whoever wrote > it, so it reflec

Re: tight-scope check confusion

2013-11-13 Thread Reuben Thomas
On 13 November 2013 19:20, Jim Meyering wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Reuben Thomas wrote: > > On 11 November 2013 14:30, Jim Meyering wrote: > >> > >> Glad you found it. > >> If you can find a good way to document it, I'd appreciate a patch. > > > > > > I can think of nothing bett

Re: There is no returning

2013-11-13 Thread Mark H Weaver
Bruce Korb writes: > On 11/10/13 12:41, Paul Eggert wrote: >> A better solution, if you want to be portable to >> MSVC, is to use _Noreturn instead of noreturn. >> This is for reasons described in stdnoreturn.in.h. >> >> '_Noreturn' is a bit ugly; if you don't care about >> MSVC, then __attribute