Re: [PATCH] tests: don't assume getdtablesize () <= 10000000

2013-06-11 Thread Paul Eggert
Thanks, I pushed the following to try to fix that. Does it work for you now? >From 342e81a945375561e6185e2ad724970b29a8129f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Eggert Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:10:21 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] tests: port large-fd POSIX spawn tests to OS X Problem reported by Daiki U

Re: [PATCH] tests: don't assume getdtablesize () <= 10000000

2013-06-11 Thread Daiki Ueno
Paul Eggert writes: > Thanks, I pushed the following to try to fix that. > Does it work for you now? Yes, all those 3 tests pass now. Thanks for the quick fix. Regards, -- Daiki Ueno

Re: Gzip 1.6 v. Tru64 and VMS

2013-06-11 Thread Paul Eggert
On 06/11/2013 04:01 PM, Steven M. Schweda wrote: >On Tru64, using a vendor-supplied C compiler, ... > CC getcwd-lgpl.o > cc: Warning: getcwd-lgpl.c, line 59: In this statement, "malloc(...)" of type > "i > nt", is being converted to "pointer to char". (cvtdiftypes) Thanks, for that p