Salut Akim!
On 27 Dec 2012, at 17:25, Akim Demaille wrote:
> I recently realized that I was stuck with an old ylwrap. I
> thought that bootstrap was appropriately upgrading my environment
> when a newer Automake was installed, but it is not the case, as
> bootstrap reads:
>
> # Tell autoreconf
Le 28 déc. 2012 à 10:35, "Gary V. Vaughan" a écrit :
> Salut Akim!
Hi Gary! Long time no see :)
> My bootstrap rewrite (used by Libtool & Zile among others) has always
> passed any `--force' from it's own command line along to all autoreconf
> and libtoolize invocations it makes without any p
Le 27 déc. 2012 à 17:45, Paul Eggert a écrit :
> On 12/27/2012 02:25 AM, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> Is there a reason not to pass --force?
>
> I can't think of one.
So here is my proposal. The only observed difference is indeed ylwrap.
(And the early arrival of 2013 in some copyright notices due
On 28 Dec 2012, at 18:00, Akim Demaille wrote:
> Le 28 déc. 2012 à 10:35, "Gary V. Vaughan" a écrit :
>> Salut Akim!
>
> Hi Gary! Long time no see :)
Too long! :)
>> My bootstrap rewrite (used by Libtool & Zile among others) has always
>> passed any `--force' from it's own command line along
Le 28 déc. 2012 à 12:39, "Gary V. Vaughan" a écrit :
> On 28 Dec 2012, at 18:00, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> Le 28 déc. 2012 à 10:35, "Gary V. Vaughan" a écrit :
>>> Salut Akim!
>>
>> Hi Gary! Long time no see :)
>
> Too long! :)
Agreed :)
>> Can't all these bootstraps be merged? Bison used
Salut Akim!
On 28 Dec 2012, at 19:22, Akim Demaille wrote:
> Le 28 déc. 2012 à 12:39, "Gary V. Vaughan" a écrit :
>> On 28 Dec 2012, at 18:00, Akim Demaille wrote:
>>> Can't all these bootstraps be merged? Bison used to have a forked
>>> one too, but Joel's and Jim's efforts resulted Bison's u
On 12/28/2012 03:02 AM, Akim Demaille wrote:
So here is my proposal.
Looks good to me, thanks.
On 12/28/2012 05:29 AM, Ondřej Bílka wrote:
Initialy I examined gnulib one but it uses hash tables and is hard to
inline so I wrote faster variant.
Where is the faster variant? Should/could it be merged into gnulib?
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 09:08:39AM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 12/28/2012 05:29 AM, Ondřej Bílka wrote:
> >Initialy I examined gnulib one but it uses hash tables and is hard to
> >inline so I wrote faster variant.
>
> Where is the faster variant?
Below. I fixed few details since first submiss
Le 28 déc. 2012 à 17:56, Paul Eggert a écrit :
> On 12/28/2012 03:02 AM, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> So here is my proposal.
>
> Looks good to me, thanks.
Pushed.
Le 28 déc. 2012 à 14:48, Gary V. Vaughan a écrit :
> The latest version can, however, be dropped directly into the override
> directory, and will upgrade itself from changes to the override module
> sources:
>
> ┌─┤gary@anungunrama│~/Devo/libtool--devo--0│master│9f2b41f│
> ├!35
> Sure thing, I also rebased them while at it...
...but forgot the script-version. v4 coming up.
Sorry for the noise.
Cheers,
Peter
* top/maint.mk (no-submodule-changes, public-submodule-commit): Quietly
proceed if git is not present.
Copyright-paperwork-exempt: yes
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin
---
top/maint.mk |6 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/top/maint.mk b/top/maint.mk
index 93c25
When building in a git checkout, but from a system lacking git, it
is useful to fall back to the version determined when the git
checkout was last used from a system sporting git.
* build-aux/git-version-gen: Add support for the new option --fallback,
which comes into play when there is no $tarbal
When building in a git checkout, but from a system lacking git, it
is useful to fall back to the version determined when the git
checkout was last used from a system sporting git.
* build-aux/git-version-gen: Add support for the new option --fallback,
which comes into play when there is no $tarbal
* top/maint.mk (no-submodule-changes, public-submodule-commit): Quietly
proceed if git is not present.
Copyright-paperwork-exempt: yes
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin
---
top/maint.mk |6 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/top/maint.mk b/top/maint.mk
index 93c25
On 2012-12-28 02:35, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 12/27/2012 03:41 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> If it helps I can regenerate with your redirection fix, but I assume
>> whoever commits it can fix that part easily enough. Just let me know.
>
> How about if you do that, and we give Eric and/or others a week
>> Sure thing, I also rebased them while at it...
>
> ...but forgot the script-version. v4 coming up.
>
> Sorry for the noise.
But sent the wrong patch anyway and also omitted the subject.
*blush*
v5 coming up.
Cheers,
Peter
* top/maint.mk (no-submodule-changes, public-submodule-commit): Quietly
proceed if git is not present.
Copyright-paperwork-exempt: yes
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin
---
top/maint.mk |6 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/top/maint.mk b/top/maint.mk
index 93c25
When building in a git checkout, but from a system lacking git, it
is useful to fall back to the version determined when the git
checkout was last used from a system sporting git.
* build-aux/git-version-gen: Add support for the new option --fallback,
which comes into play when there is no $tarbal
20 matches
Mail list logo
