Hi all,
Here is an updated proposal, that was taking into account
several comments made last week.
0001-bootstrap-let-warn-be-like-tests-init.sh-s-warn_.patch
Description: Binary data
Akim Demaille wrote:
> Here is an updated proposal, that was taking into account
> several comments made last week.
Looks fine, modulo a question and test artifacts:
Thanks!
...
> -warn()
> +# warnf_ FORMAT-STRING ARG1...
> +warnf_ ()
> {
> - for i
> - do
> -echo "$i"
> - done | sed -e "s
Le 10 juil. 2012 à 10:14, Jim Meyering a écrit :
>> + case $* in
>> +*$nl*) me_=$(printf "$me"|tr "$nl|" '??')
>
> Is it worth testing for both $nl and '|' ?
I tried to keep what you did about $nl in $me (it would break
the sed command). I used printf, since the \n from echo gave
a spurio
On Sat 07 Jul 2012 22:42, Jim Meyering writes:
>> - --prefix prefix of git tags (default 'v')
>> + --prefix prefix of git tags to strip from version (default 'v')
>> + --match pattern for git tags to match
>
> Please mention that it's a "glob" pattern,
> so people don't t
Akim Demaille wrote:
> Le 10 juil. 2012 à 10:14, Jim Meyering a écrit :
>
>>> + case $* in
>>> +*$nl*) me_=$(printf "$me"|tr "$nl|" '??')
>>
>> Is it worth testing for both $nl and '|' ?
>
> I tried to keep what you did about $nl in $me (it would break
> the sed command). I used printf, sinc
Le 10 juil. 2012 à 12:05, Jim Meyering a écrit :
> Akim Demaille wrote:
>
>> Le 10 juil. 2012 à 10:14, Jim Meyering a écrit :
>>
+ case $* in
+*$nl*) me_=$(printf "$me"|tr "$nl|" '??')
>>>
>>> Is it worth testing for both $nl and '|' ?
>>
>> I tried to keep what you did about $n
Akim Demaille wrote:
> Le 10 juil. 2012 à 12:05, Jim Meyering a écrit :
>
>> Akim Demaille wrote:
>>
>>> Le 10 juil. 2012 à 10:14, Jim Meyering a écrit :
>>>
> + case $* in
> +*$nl*) me_=$(printf "$me"|tr "$nl|" '??')
Is it worth testing for both $nl and '|' ?
>>>
>>> I trie
Libvirt would like to use lib/stat-time.h to portably get at nanosecond
timestamps from an LGPLv2+ license; but this file is currently licensed
LGPLv3+. Any objections to relaxing the license, particularly since
POSIX 2008 guarantees that stat() should be returning this information
and the stat mo
Eric Blake wrote:
> Libvirt would like to use lib/stat-time.h to portably get at nanosecond
> timestamps from an LGPLv2+ license; but this file is currently licensed
> LGPLv3+. Any objections to relaxing the license, particularly since
> POSIX 2008 guarantees that stat() should be returning this i
On 07/10/2012 06:29 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> That is fine with me.
> (Bruno and Paul should also sign off)
Fine with me too.
Eric Blake wrote:
> > Libvirt would like to use lib/stat-time.h to portably get at nanosecond
> > timestamps from an LGPLv2+ license; but this file is currently licensed
> > LGPLv3+. Any objections to relaxing the license, particularly since
> > POSIX 2008 guarantees that stat() should be returnin
On 07/10/2012 04:25 PM, Glenn Morris wrote:
> I suspect that Gnulib already has the AIX
> case covered (via "__unix"?), so that src/s/aix4-2.h no longer needs to
> define "unix".
Yes, that sounds right. I have started to fix this by
installing the following patch into gnulib, and will
propagate t
12 matches
Mail list logo
