Re: xstrtol: fix test failure on mingw

2008-04-23 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Jim, > > ! LC_ALL=C tr -d '\r' < t-xstrtoimax.tmp > t-xstrtoimax.xo > I hear that there really do exist systems in actual use > on which tr still does not honor backslash-escapes like \r and \n. Which platforms, please? (I use the similar idiom in more than 200 files in gettext. So I need to k

Re: xstrtol: fix test failure on mingw

2008-04-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Bruno, * Bruno Haible wrote on Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:55:49PM CEST: > > > ! LC_ALL=C tr -d '\r' < t-xstrtoimax.tmp > t-xstrtoimax.xo > > I hear that there really do exist systems in actual use > > on which tr still does not honor backslash-escapes like \r and \n. > > Which platforms, please?

Re: memchr2 speed, gcc

2008-04-23 Thread Eric Blake
Bruno Haible clisp.org> writes: > > + New module 'memchr2'. > > Wondering why you used 'uintmax_t' as basic word type, rather than the > 'unsigned long' that memchr.c uses, I benchmarked this and a few other > variations of the memchr2.c implementation. > > Summary of results: > - With gcc