Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> I am committing your patch to xstrtol.h, with updated variable names and
> comments. Also, a corresponding change to the 'human' module. Find attached
> the corresponding coreutils change (untested but obvious).
>
> 2007-07-25 Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PRO
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 07:25:23AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> > This would
> > mandate an explicit after the program is executed as well.
^ reread / flushing of cached content
> The second transfer of active handle occurs when the child exits and
> returns control to m4.
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Please revert those changes.
>
> Reverted. Sorry, I thought the were straightforward and in line with what
> you would agree to.
Thanks.
No hard feelings, of course.
The patches are probably ok, but I won't have time to deal with
th
[Arrgh - your reply arrived after I left my primary computer,
and I'm using nabble to respond which does not understand
reply-to-all; feel free to repost this reply to the full cc chain]
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> The missing part above might clarify what I meant. Normally a stdio
> implementatio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Joerg Sonnenberger on 7/25/2007 7:59 AM:
> OK, I'm still not fully sure I understand all parts of the problem. The
> flushing happens in debug_flush_files, right? When the called programs
> reads from stdin itself, is m4 supposed to see su
Hello Jim,
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Please revert those changes.
Reverted. Sorry, I thought the were straightforward and in line with what
you would agree to.
> More importantly, don't you think you should have waited for approval
> from Paul (and discussion on this list) before making an _interfac
