Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andreas Schwab wrote about IA-64 Pseudo-NaNs:
>> It's definitely not a valid encoding.
>
> [1] calls it an "unsupported" encoding.
Don't mix the ia64 fpu register encoding with the i387 extended real
encoding. They are unrelated.
Read the ia32 manual:
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The purpose of the test is not to create a signalling NaN (despite the
> comment saying so). The purpose is to create a binary representation of
> a NaN that is not one of the "usual" NaNs.
Even if that were true (which obviously isn't), it still fails t
Hi Bruno,
On 2 Jun 2007, at 01:43, Bruno Haible wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan reported in
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/10446
that on IRIX 6.5:
test-lseek.sh fails with SIGSYS.
This works around it by disabling the corresponding portion of the
test.
It's rare that program c
On 2 Jun 2007, at 02:55, Bruno Haible wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan reported in
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/10446
that on Solaris/SPARC:
Thanks for that 'truss' log. It clearly points to the bug in the
test. This
should fix it.
2007-06-01 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Bruno,
[[Cc:ing Albert Chin: Albert, why do we need +Onofltacc in the
standard hpux11.23
flags, when it clearly causes NaN regressions?]]
On 3 Jun 2007, at 01:48, Bruno Haible wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan wrote in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2007-06/msg5.html
[For som
Hi Bruno,
On 3 Jun 2007, at 02:03, Bruno Haible wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
powerpc-apple-darwin8.9.0: 2 failed gnulib tests
Cannot reproduce on powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0. Which compiler and
optimization
flags did you use?
Gcc from Apple's Xcode package as shipped on my Tiger inst
Hi Bruno,
[[Cc:ing Albert Chin for context surrounding my last post]]
On 3 Jun 2007, at 02:15, Bruno Haible wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20: Unable to compile 1 gnulib test;
2 gnulib test failures and 1 failed m4 check
cc -I. -I../lib -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -I../lib -I./../
Hi Bruno,
On 3 Jun 2007, at 01:48, Bruno Haible wrote:
[For some reason, I can see your last 3 mails on gmane and on
lists.gnu.org,
but they don't came into my mailbox. And I have no spam filter.]
[sorry to respond on-list, but there is no other way to contact you
right now!]
You're MTA
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 02:53:22PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> [[Cc:ing Albert Chin: Albert, why do we need +Onofltacc in the
> standard hpux11.23
> flags, when it clearly causes NaN regressions?]]
>From the cc(1) man page:
+O[no]fltacc Disable [enable] floating-point optimiz
Hello Gary,
Thanks for the help. I forwarded the two delivery failure reports to my mail
provider. Let's see...
In the meantime, you can CC me under >>bhaible at web dot de<<.
Thanks.
Bruno
Albert Chin wrote:
> From the cc(1) man page:
>+O[no]fltacc Disable [enable] floating-point optimizations that
> can result in numerical differences.
> ...
> So, +Onofltacc disables floating-point optimizations.
I interpret this differently:
+O
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 04:24:26AM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Albert Chin wrote:
> > From the cc(1) man page:
> >+O[no]fltacc Disable [enable] floating-point optimizations that
> > can result in numerical differences.
> > ...
> > So, +Onofltacc disables flo
12 matches
Mail list logo
