Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +(for example free BSD variants), and it is nice to support other
Why not mention NetBSD, FreeBSD and OpenBSD by name? There are other
free BSD variants too, which are less popular, and it doesn't make
sense to spend much time on them IMHO.
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
>> Wouldn't this be a good situation to have nanosleep depend on the
>> unistd module, and make the replacement unistd.h include winsock2.h on
>> mingw32 platforms? After all, nanosleep.c include unistd.h,
On Fri, 19. May 2006, 11:01:49 -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> There's one other thing about this particular problem that may save us
> here, though. The current code tests that nanosleep works at runtime,
> not merely whether it links. I suspect this is overkill, at least
> nowadays. And, since the
Hello Karl,
The solution to the problem of multiple plurals is GNU gettext's
ngettext() function. The format is
char * ngettext (const char *msgid1, const char *msgid2, unsigned long int n)
The first two arguments are the English singular and plural, which are
necessary because gettext defaul
Martin Lambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, unfortunately it does not, because the target system does not have a
> nanosleep function.
OK. Do the other parts of the patch (e.g., the HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H,
TIME_WITH_SYS_TIME, etc.) address the problem? If not, what problems
do you encounter wit
