Paul Eggert wrote:
> > I propose to change the gradual underflow behaviour of xstrtod
>
> Sounds good. The current behavior with MSVC does make more sense.
Done:
2024-07-24 Bruno Haible
xstrtod, xstrtold: Don't treat gradual underflow as an error.
* lib/xstrtod.c (XSTRTOD):
On 2024-07-23 12:35, Bruno Haible wrote:
I propose to change the gradual underflow behaviour of xstrtod
Sounds good. The current behavior with MSVC does make more sense.
Hi,
In the current behaviour of xstrtod:
Condition RET *RESULT errno
-
conversion error: no number parsed false 0.0
EINVAL or 0
PTR =
