Bruno Haible clisp.org> writes:
> Two nits (I'm really only nitpicking):
>
> - You introduce two #ifs that have to be the same condition:
> #if HAVE_FUTIMESAT || HAVE_WORKING_UTIMES
> ...
> #if HAVE_FUTIMESAT || HAVE_WORKING_UTIMES
And only so that C89 compilation will work when you
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to Eric Blake on 5/22/2008 6:51 AM:
> | According to Jim Meyering on 5/22/2008 6:42 AM:
> | |> |> No need to refer the dir by name:
> | |> |>
> | |> |> futimens (dirfd. timespec);
> | |> |
> | |> | Btw., even if you don't consider the Posix 200x f
Eric Blake wrote:
> Tested on cygwin 1.7.0, where futimens and utimensat exist, and on cygwin
> 1.5.25, where those and futimesat are all missing. OK to apply? This
> means that coreutils can now support nanosecond resolution on new enough
> kernels for things like touch and cp -p.
Two nits (I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Eric Blake on 5/22/2008 6:51 AM:
| According to Jim Meyering on 5/22/2008 6:42 AM:
| |> |> No need to refer the dir by name:
| |> |>
| |> |> futimens (dirfd. timespec);
| |> |
| |> | Btw., even if you don't consider the Posix 200x funct
