Paul Eggert wrote:
> "Derek R. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Since the utime module only switches on the result of
>> AC_FUNC_UTIME_NULL, and the Autoconf 2.60 documentation labels
>> AC_FUNC_UTIME_NULL as obsolescent for lack of practical porting
"Derek R. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since the utime module only switches on the result of
> AC_FUNC_UTIME_NULL, and the Autoconf 2.60 documentation labels
> AC_FUNC_UTIME_NULL as obsolescent for lack of practical porting targets,
> would be okay to remove
Since the utime module only switches on the result of
AC_FUNC_UTIME_NULL, and the Autoconf 2.60 documentation labels
AC_FUNC_UTIME_NULL as obsolescent for lack of practical porting targets,
would be okay to remove the utime module from GNULIB?
This would mean removing lib/utime.c, m4/utime.m4
