Re: [bug-gnulib] updating with gnulib-tool

2007-01-12 Thread Bruno Haible
Lorenzo Bettini wrote: > I noticed, after an update that this file is also added in the gnulib > directory > > gnulib-common.m4 > > but it is not included in the tarbal, is it the expected behavior? It is harmless. gnulib-tool adds the file gnulib-common.m4 always; aclocal then determines wheth

Re: [bug-gnulib] updating with gnulib-tool

2007-01-12 Thread Eric Blake-1
mmon.m4 > > but it is not included in the tarbal, is it the expected behavior? Only gnulib-cache.m4 needs to be in the tarball. All other gnulib-*.m4 files are generated automatically by gnulib-tool --update. -- Eric Blake -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/updati

Re: [bug-gnulib] updating with gnulib-tool

2007-01-12 Thread Lorenzo Bettini
Eric Blake wrote: > According to Lorenzo Bettini on 12/20/2006 12:44 PM: >>> Thanks for the feedback. Last time we discussed whether gnulib-cache.m4 >>> should be added to EXTRA_DIST by gnulib-tool, so that anyone getting a >>> tarball can do "gnulib-tool --update", there was no consensus. A majori

Re: [bug-gnulib] updating with gnulib-tool

2007-01-02 Thread Lorenzo Bettini
Eric Blake wrote: > According to Lorenzo Bettini on 12/20/2006 12:44 PM: >>> Thanks for the feedback. Last time we discussed whether gnulib-cache.m4 >>> should be added to EXTRA_DIST by gnulib-tool, so that anyone getting a >>> tarball can do "gnulib-tool --update", there was no consensus. A majori

Re: [bug-gnulib] updating with gnulib-tool

2006-12-20 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Lorenzo Bettini on 12/20/2006 12:44 PM: >> Thanks for the feedback. Last time we discussed whether gnulib-cache.m4 >> should be added to EXTRA_DIST by gnulib-tool, so that anyone getting a >> tarball can do "gnulib-tool --update", there wa

Re: [bug-gnulib] updating with gnulib-tool

2006-12-20 Thread Lorenzo Bettini
Bruno Haible wrote: Lorenzo Bettini wrote: Maybe: "gnulib-tool --update" relies on the presence of gnulib-comp.m4 and gnulib-cache.m4. OK, those files were not there (this is because gnulib-cache.m4 is not included in the .tar.gz produced by make dist, is this correct?) now --update works

Re: [bug-gnulib] updating with gnulib-tool

2006-12-20 Thread Bruno Haible
Lorenzo Bettini wrote: > > Maybe: "gnulib-tool --update" relies on the presence of gnulib-comp.m4 and > > gnulib-cache.m4. > > > > OK, those files were not there (this is because gnulib-cache.m4 is not > included in the .tar.gz produced by make dist, is this correct?) > > now --update works as

Re: [bug-gnulib] updating with gnulib-tool

2006-12-20 Thread Lorenzo Bettini
Bruno Haible wrote: Lorenzo Bettini wrote: ~/work/gnulib/gnulib-tool --update --dry-run Module list with included dependencies: File list: lib/dummy.c m4/onceonly_2_57.m4 Create directory ./lib Create directory ./m4 Create directory ./lib Create directory ./m4 Copy file lib/dummy.c Copy f

Re: [bug-gnulib] updating with gnulib-tool

2006-12-20 Thread Bruno Haible
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > "gnulib-tool --update" relies on the presence of gnulib-comp.m4 and > > gnulib-cache.m4. > > Which may be found only after knowing the value of $m4base, as that's > where those files are. There's a trick. Look at gnulib-tool lines 2780..2818. Bruno

Re: [bug-gnulib] updating with gnulib-tool

2006-12-20 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Bruno Haible wrote on Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 03:01:47PM CET: > Lorenzo Bettini wrote: > > ~/work/gnulib/gnulib-tool --update --dry-run [...] > > probably I forgot to include in the CVS some vital file? > > Maybe: "gnulib-tool --update" relies on the presence of gnulib-comp.m4 and > gnulib-cache.m4

Re: [bug-gnulib] updating with gnulib-tool

2006-12-20 Thread Bruno Haible
Lorenzo Bettini wrote: > ~/work/gnulib/gnulib-tool --update --dry-run > Module list with included dependencies: > > File list: >lib/dummy.c >m4/onceonly_2_57.m4 > Create directory ./lib > Create directory ./m4 > Create directory ./lib > Create directory ./m4 > Copy file lib/dummy.c > Copy

Re: [bug-gnulib] updating with gnulib-tool

2006-12-20 Thread Lorenzo Bettini
Bruno Haible wrote: Lorenzo Bettini wrote: as reported in the documentation, I have the source base and m4 base, resp., in gl and gl/m4 now I'm trying to run gnulib-tool --update as follows, but I get an error: gnulib-tool --update --m4-base=gl/m4/ --source-base=gl/ --dry-run gnulib-tool: inv

Re: [bug-gnulib] updating with gnulib-tool

2006-12-19 Thread Bruno Haible
Lorenzo Bettini wrote: > as reported in the documentation, I have the source base and m4 base, > resp., in gl and gl/m4 > > now I'm trying to run gnulib-tool --update as follows, but I get an error: > > gnulib-tool --update --m4-base=gl/m4/ --source-base=gl/ --dry-run > gnulib-tool: invalid opti

updating with gnulib-tool

2006-12-19 Thread Lorenzo Bettini
Hi as reported in the documentation, I have the source base and m4 base, resp., in gl and gl/m4 now I'm trying to run gnulib-tool --update as follows, but I get an error: gnulib-tool --update --m4-base=gl/m4/ --source-base=gl/ --dry-run gnulib-tool: invalid options for 'update' mode Try 'gnul