Joel E. Denny wrote:
> Hi Eric and Jim.
>
> On Sat, 15 Aug 2009, Eric Blake wrote:
>
>> According to Jim Meyering on 8/15/2009 2:37 AM:
>> >> It changed a bit due to the merge; here's what I'm pushing.
>>
>> I haven't pushed yet, in case we decide something different...
>>
>> > ...
>> >> grep -l
Hi Eric and Jim.
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009, Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Jim Meyering on 8/15/2009 2:37 AM:
> >> It changed a bit due to the merge; here's what I'm pushing.
>
> I haven't pushed yet, in case we decide something different...
>
> > ...
> >>grep -l -w Copyright $$($(VC_LIST_EXCEP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Meyering on 8/15/2009 6:46 AM:
> Obviously not worth duplicating code.
> I was thinking about projects with active ChangeLog files in
> subdirectories, e.g. gcc, emacs, glibc (not rotated ones).
They can provide an empty .x-update-cop
Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Jim Meyering on 8/15/2009 2:37 AM:
>>> It changed a bit due to the merge; here's what I'm pushing.
>
> I haven't pushed yet, in case we decide something different...
>
>> ...
>>> grep -l -w Copyright $$($(VC_LIST_EXCEPT)) \
>>> - | grep -v -E '
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Meyering on 8/15/2009 2:37 AM:
>> It changed a bit due to the merge; here's what I'm pushing.
I haven't pushed yet, in case we decide something different...
> ...
>> grep -l -w Copyright $$($(VC_LIST_EXCEPT)) \
>> -
Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Jim Meyering on 8/14/2009 1:11 PM:
>>> Hmm. VC_LIST_EXCEPT excludes ChangeLog by default, but this is one case
>>> where
>>> we WANT ChangeLog's copyright updated along with everything else. Also, I
>>> think we should be exempting all forms of COPYING (such as C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Meyering on 8/14/2009 1:11 PM:
>> Hmm. VC_LIST_EXCEPT excludes ChangeLog by default, but this is one case
>> where
>> we WANT ChangeLog's copyright updated along with everything else. Also, I
>> think we should be exempting all form
Eric Blake wrote:
> Jim Meyering meyering.net> writes:
>> +# If you have an additional project-specific rule,
>> +# define it in cfg.mk and set this variable to its name.
>> +update-copyright-local ?=
>> +
>> .PHONY: update-copyright
>> -update-copyright:
>> +update-copyright: $(update-copyright-
Jim Meyering meyering.net> writes:
>
> +# If you have an additional project-specific rule,
> +# define it in cfg.mk and set this variable to its name.
> +update-copyright-local ?=
> +
> .PHONY: update-copyright
> -update-copyright:
> +update-copyright: $(update-copyright-local)
I'm wondering i
Joel E. Denny wrote:
...
> That works for me. Thanks, and thanks for reviewing and pushing all my
> other patches.
>
> I'm not sure where ties between modules and maint.mk should be documented,
> but the stale advice in update-copyright ought to updated. Here's a
> patch.
Good idea. Pushed.
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Heh. Let's write my bogus suggestion off to morning caffeine deficiency.
:)
> How about this instead?
>
> >From 0ec4fb7d6c2533eb4bb588f64616dd9c6883bcb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jim Meyering
> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 09:25:05 +0200
> Subject: [P
Joel E. Denny wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
>> Joel E. Denny wrote:
>> > For Bison, update-copyright is not enough. Our backend skeletons contain
>> > m4 macro invocations with lists of copyright years as arguments. I've a
>> > written a script and a makefile target to handl
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Joel E. Denny wrote:
> > For Bison, update-copyright is not enough. Our backend skeletons contain
> > m4 macro invocations with lists of copyright years as arguments. I've a
> > written a script and a makefile target to handle these, but I would like
> >
Joel E. Denny wrote:
> For Bison, update-copyright is not enough. Our backend skeletons contain
> m4 macro invocations with lists of copyright years as arguments. I've a
> written a script and a makefile target to handle these, but I would like
> it to be called by maint.mk's update-copyright tar
For Bison, update-copyright is not enough. Our backend skeletons contain
m4 macro invocations with lists of copyright years as arguments. I've a
written a script and a makefile target to handle these, but I would like
it to be called by maint.mk's update-copyright target rule so we don't
forg
15 matches
Mail list logo
