Jim Meyering wrote:
> Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, Eric Blake wrote:
>>
>>> The original was:
>>>
>>>Copyright (C) 1995,97,99 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>>>
>>> and that pattern (4-digits followed by 2-digits, with gaps in the years,
>>> but no spaces in the listing) is not
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, Eric Blake wrote:
>
>> The original was:
>>
>>Copyright (C) 1995,97,99 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>>
>> and that pattern (4-digits followed by 2-digits, with gaps in the years,
>> but no spaces in the listing) is not currently tested in the
>> up
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, Eric Blake wrote:
> The original was:
>
>Copyright (C) 1995,97,99 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>
> and that pattern (4-digits followed by 2-digits, with gaps in the years,
> but no spaces in the listing) is not currently tested in the
> update-copyright testsuite.
I do
On 01/02/2013 12:31 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> A second check of the automatic copyright updates for glibc showed that
> update-copyright had corrupted some of the copyright notices. I've
> applied this glibc patch to fix that corruption. bug-gnulib: see
> attachment for a testcase. Run upd
A second check of the automatic copyright updates for glibc showed that
update-copyright had corrupted some of the copyright notices. I've
applied this glibc patch to fix that corruption. bug-gnulib: see
attachment for a testcase. Run update-copyright as:
UPDATE_COPYRIGHT_FORCE=1 UPDATE_COPY
