Jim Meyering wrote:
> What do you think about using the existing run-test code when possible,
> but to resort to using that hard-coded list when cross-compiling?
> That way, the code adapts well (at least in some cases) when it finds
> a new type of system for which this is applicable.
Possible.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:26 AM Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> The module 'unlink-busy' does not support cross-compilation: It uses
> AC_RUN_IFELSE, thus calling the compiler for the host, and then sets
> INSTALL, which is meant to point to a command to execute on
Hi Jim,
The module 'unlink-busy' does not support cross-compilation: It uses
AC_RUN_IFELSE, thus calling the compiler for the host, and then sets
INSTALL, which is meant to point to a command to execute on the build machine.
It should IMO better use the compiler for the build machine
