Bruno Haible wrote:
>> I noticed that when the test-c-stack2.sh test is skipped,
>> it leaves behind its temporary file.
>>
>> I propose to fix it by adding a trap ... 0.
>
> I would prefer the attached patch, because it's simpler (straightforward)
> and avoids the 'trap ... 0' command which
> 1.
Hi Jim,
> I noticed that when the test-c-stack2.sh test is skipped,
> it leaves behind its temporary file.
>
> I propose to fix it by adding a trap ... 0.
I would prefer the attached patch, because it's simpler (straightforward)
and avoids the 'trap ... 0' command which
1. has portability prob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Meyering on 11/14/2009 8:37 AM:
> Who would object to my making every test script source a file
> that contains this function definition:
Making every gnulib unit test shell script source a common file seems
reasonable to me.
- --
Do
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 02:51:34PM CET:
>> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> > But that separate patch would belong before your proposed one, as the
>> > zero trap exposes this issue more.
>>
>> If someone actually objects, I'll change each exit N to "(exit N);
* Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 02:51:34PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > But that separate patch would belong before your proposed one, as the
> > zero trap exposes this issue more.
>
> If someone actually objects, I'll change each exit N to "(exit N); exit N"
> in the affected fi
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 01:33:14PM CET:
>> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> > Not only that, you also have to ensure to get the right exit status into
>> > the zero trap, by using something like
>> > (exit $N); exit $N
>> >
>> > throughout, see '(autoconf.in
* Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 01:33:14PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Not only that, you also have to ensure to get the right exit status into
> > the zero trap, by using something like
> > (exit $N); exit $N
> >
> > throughout, see '(autoconf.info)Limitations of Builtins'.
>
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 01:11:38PM CET:
>> I propose to fix it by adding a trap ... 0.
>> A welcome side-effect is that with this change, you remove
>> temporary files from only one place: the trap, rather
>> than just prior to every other exit point.
>
Hi Jim,
* Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 01:11:38PM CET:
> I propose to fix it by adding a trap ... 0.
> A welcome side-effect is that with this change, you remove
> temporary files from only one place: the trap, rather
> than just prior to every other exit point.
>
> The only tricky
I noticed that when the test-c-stack2.sh test is skipped,
it leaves behind its temporary file.
I propose to fix it by adding a trap ... 0.
A welcome side-effect is that with this change, you remove
temporary files from only one place: the trap, rather
than just prior to every other exit point.
Th
10 matches
Mail list logo
