Pádraig Brady wrote:
> I think the last check in timeout-parameters needs
> the same treatment?
>
> tests: avoid a spurious failure on a loaded system
>
> * tests/misc/timeout-parameters: This test would fail due to
> the 1-second timeout expiring before a command of "no_such"
> cou
I think the last check in timeout-parameters needs
the same treatment?
cheers,
Pádraig.
commit 05327326c6f66650c685e26b777140782d300233
Author: Pádraig Brady
Date: Fri Nov 13 22:52:14 2009 +
tests: avoid a spurious failure on a loaded system
* tests/misc/timeout-parameters: This
Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Jim Meyering on 11/13/2009 8:41 AM:
>> - the second to avoid compilation failure on rawhide, presumably
>> due to its newer header files.
>
> More likely, due to a cygwin bug for exposing SIZE_MAX without requiring
> . Newer Linux is better about keeping he
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Meyering on 11/13/2009 8:41 AM:
> - the second to avoid compilation failure on rawhide, presumably
> due to its newer header files.
More likely, due to a cygwin bug for exposing SIZE_MAX without requiring
. Newer Linux is bet
