Re: test failures: crc, md4, gc-md4

2006-05-11 Thread Simon Josefsson
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Simon, > > * Simon Josefsson wrote on Thu, May 11, 2006 at 06:14:19PM CEST: >> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > >> > There's still the test-crc failure remaining. > >> > | cu got b9a9a617 >> > | FAIL: test-crc > >> Hi Ralf! Paul's f

Re: test failures: crc, md4, gc-md4

2006-05-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Simon, * Simon Josefsson wrote on Thu, May 11, 2006 at 06:14:19PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > There's still the test-crc failure remaining. > > | cu got b9a9a617 > > | FAIL: test-crc > Hi Ralf! Paul's fixes to the crc module are installed now, did they > solve

Re: test failures: crc, md4, gc-md4

2006-05-11 Thread Simon Josefsson
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Simon, > > * Simon Josefsson wrote on Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:39:50PM CEST: >> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > FYI, a few of the gnulib tests currently fail: >> > On x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (omitting passed tests): > >> > FAIL:

Re: test failures: crc, md4, gc-md4

2006-05-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Simon, * Simon Josefsson wrote on Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:39:50PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > FYI, a few of the gnulib tests currently fail: > > On x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (omitting passed tests): > > FAIL: test-gc-md4 > > FAIL: test-md4 > > Someone reported t

Re: test failures: crc, md4, gc-md4

2006-05-11 Thread Simon Josefsson
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> -#define rol(x,n) ( ((x) << (n)) | ((x) >> (32-(n))) ) >> +#define rol(x, n) (((x) << (n)) | ((uint32_t) (x) >> (32 - (n > ... >> -#define rol(x, n) (((x) << (n)) | ((x) >> (32 - (n >> +#define rol(x, n) (((x) << (n)) | ((uint32_t) (x) >> (32

Re: test failures: crc, md4, gc-md4

2006-05-10 Thread Simon Josefsson
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> -#define K1 0x5a827999L >> -#define K2 0x6ed9eba1L >> +#define K1 0x5a827999 >> +#define K2 0x6ed9eba1 > > That fixes the bug on hosts where int is 32 bits and long is 64 bits, > but if I understand the prob

Re: test failures: crc, md4, gc-md4

2006-05-10 Thread Paul Eggert
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > -#define K1 0x5a827999L > -#define K2 0x6ed9eba1L > +#define K1 0x5a827999 > +#define K2 0x6ed9eba1 That fixes the bug on hosts where int is 32 bits and long is 64 bits, but if I understand the problem you found, then surely the bug remains on hosts w

Re: test failures: crc, md4, gc-md4

2006-05-10 Thread Simon Josefsson
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > FYI, a few of the gnulib tests currently fail: > On x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (omitting passed tests): ... > md4 1 mismatch. expected: > a4 48 01 7a af 21 d8 52 5f c1 0a e8 7a a6 72 9d > computed: > 29 e6 63 dd dc 61 52 69 91 85 da 92 ed 96 c8 b1 > FAIL

Re: test failures: crc, md4, gc-md4

2006-03-04 Thread Simon Josefsson
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > FYI, a few of the gnulib tests currently fail: > On x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (omitting passed tests): Interesting. It smells like a 64bit bug, but Solaris 2.8 seem weird. I'll try to find time to look into these in more detail. I'd appreciate if you

test failures: crc, md4, gc-md4

2006-02-24 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
FYI, a few of the gnulib tests currently fail: On x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (omitting passed tests): cu got b9a9a617 FAIL: test-crc md4 1 mismatch. expected: a4 48 01 7a af 21 d8 52 5f c1 0a e8 7a a6 72 9d computed: 29 e6 63 dd dc 61 52 69 91 85 da 92 ed 96 c8 b1 FAIL: test-gc-md4 expected: a4 48