Re: stat-time LGPL

2010-01-19 Thread James Youngman
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Bruno Haible wrote: > Hi James, > > The lib/stat-time.h file in gnulib to which you contributed on 2007-03-27 > is under GPL. Guile would like to use it (see attached mail), but Guile is > LGPL. Can you agree to relicensing this file under LGPL? Paul Eggert has >

Re: stat-time LGPL

2010-01-19 Thread James Youngman
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Bruno Haible wrote: > Hi Paul and James, > > The lib/stat-time.h file that you contributed to gnulib is under GPL. > Guile would like to use it (see attached mail), but Guile is LGPL. Can you > agree to relicensing this file under LGPL? Of course. James.

Fwd: stat-time LGPL

2010-01-16 Thread Bruno Haible
Forwarded message Subject: stat-time LGPL Date: 2010-01-08 From: Andy Wingo To: bug-gnulib@gnu.org Hi, Guile needs some way of dealing with nanosecond timestamps in stat structures. stat-time looks like the right thing but it is GPL. It depends on time and

Fwd: stat-time LGPL

2010-01-08 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Paul and James, The lib/stat-time.h file that you contributed to gnulib is under GPL. Guile would like to use it (see attached mail), but Guile is LGPL. Can you agree to relicensing this file under LGPL? Bruno Forwarded message Subject: stat-time

stat-time LGPL

2010-01-08 Thread Andy Wingo
Hi, Guile needs some way of dealing with nanosecond timestamps in stat structures. stat-time looks like the right thing but it is GPL. It depends on time and extensions, which are both LGPLv2+. Can stat-time be made lgpl? Thanks, Andy