Karl Berry wrote:
> * doc/standards.texi (System Portability): Spell out `free BSD
> variants', instead of using the term `*BSD'.
>
> Before I bother rms with this, can you please explain to me the
> objection to "*BSD"? I'd never heard that before. NetBSD and OpenBSD
> do
Hi Ralf,
* doc/standards.texi (System Portability): Spell out `free BSD
variants', instead of using the term `*BSD'.
Before I bother rms with this, can you please explain to me the
objection to "*BSD"? I'd never heard that before. NetBSD and OpenBSD
don't like being lump
* Bruno Haible wrote on Fri, May 19, 2006 at 03:07:01PM CEST:
> Paul Eggert wrote:
> >
> > Would WOE32_NATIVE be a better name?
>
> Many people believe code should be neutral.
FWIW, I agree. After all, POSIX_ME_HARDER was dropped, too.
I removed occurrences of M$VC and *BSD from the Libtool sour
