Re: solaris 9: undefined symbol rpl_open

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Thomas Guyot-Sionnest on 11/8/2009 10:17 PM: >> Maybe you have some stale state, possibly from an outdated .m4 macro being >> picked up, or a config.cache that is not remembering the right values. I've >> also seen cases where 'rm gl/fc

Re: solaris 9: undefined symbol rpl_open

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 27/10/09 10:13 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > Thomas Guyot-Sionnest aei.ca> writes: > >> # Reproduce by: gnulib-tool --import --dir=. --lib=libgnu >> --source-base=gl --m4-base=gl/m4 --doc-base=doc --tests-base=tests >> --aux-dir=build-aux --no-libtool -

Re: solaris 9: undefined symbol rpl_open

Thomas Guyot-Sionnest aei.ca> writes: > # Reproduce by: gnulib-tool --import --dir=. --lib=libgnu > --source-base=gl --m4-base=gl/m4 --doc-base=doc --tests-base=tests > --aux-dir=build-aux --no-libtool --macro-prefix=gl base64 dirname floorf > fsusage getaddrinfo gethostname getloadavg getopt get

Re: solaris 9: undefined symbol rpl_open

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 26/10/09 07:54 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > According to Thomas Guyot-Sionnest on 10/26/2009 1:46 AM: >> So from what I can see from the error output pst3.o requires rpl_open >> because the gnulib includes redefine open as rpl_open in some systems >> (if

Re: solaris 9: undefined symbol rpl_open

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Thomas Guyot-Sionnest on 10/26/2009 1:46 AM: > So from what I can see from the error output pst3.o requires rpl_open > because the gnulib includes redefine open as rpl_open in some systems > (if @GNULIB_OPEN@ && @REPLACE_OPEN@), but fail t

Re: solaris 9: undefined symbol rpl_open

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25/10/09 04:48 PM, Bruno Haible wrote: > Thomas Guyot-Sionnest wrote: >> The builds are now complaining about a missing rpl_open symbol. >> ... >> Any idea what's wrong? > > First, you can determine whether the problem is in gnulib or in your packa

Re: solaris 9: undefined symbol rpl_open

Thomas Guyot-Sionnest wrote: > The builds are now complaining about a missing rpl_open symbol. > ... > Any idea what's wrong? First, you can determine whether the problem is in gnulib or in your package. Run $ gnulib-tool --test --with-tests open If this fails on Solaris 9, the problem is in gn

solaris 9: undefined symbol rpl_open

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Since the last release of Nagios-plugins we updated the gnulib code to cb75dc5 (from a version dating Tue Feb 12 11:07:18 2008 +) and this appears to break solaris 9 builds (my solaris 10 seems to be immune so far). The builds are now complain