> *** modules/poll-tests.orig 2008-09-29 11:32:59.0 +0200
> --- modules/poll-tests2008-09-29 11:32:45.0 +0200
> ***
> *** 18,20
> --- 18,21
> Makefile.am:
> TESTS += test-poll
> check_PROGRAMS += test-poll
> + test_poll_LDADD = $(LDADD) @LIBSOC
> *** modules/sys_select-tests.orig 2008-09-28 20:36:59.0 +0200
> --- modules/sys_select-tests 2008-09-28 19:43:06.0 +0200
> ***
> *** 16,21
> --- 16,22
> Makefile.am:
> TESTS += test-sys_select
> check_PROGRAMS += test-sys_select
> + test_sys_selec
Hi Simon,
> Ah, yes, I remember this. The module was never tested on Solaris
> before. Btw, possibly you'll need -lnsl too? I recall that the idiom
> to get anything moderately complex to build on Solaris was to add -lnsl
> -lsockets.
No, -lnsl is not needed always, and in particular not for t
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Here are two change requests regarding the 'sockets' module:
>
> 1) Currently it adds the library option -lws2_32 to LIBS. But I don't want
>to link all gettext tools against this libray, just because one program
>(test-sys_select) n
Hi Simon,
Here are two change requests regarding the 'sockets' module:
1) Currently it adds the library option -lws2_32 to LIBS. But I don't want
to link all gettext tools against this libray, just because one program
(test-sys_select) needs to link with it. So I propose to introduce a
v
