The placement of the HAVE_STRUCT_SIGACTION_SA_SIGACTION also was not consistent
with the code structure in lib/. I'm committing this:
2008-09-21 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* m4/sigaction.m4 (gl_SIGACTION): Remove unnecessary AC_SUBST. Check
whether 'st
work with libsigsegv, once we downgrade the
> >> compiler error on sa_sigaction to a warning.
> >>
> > Let's hope so though it didn't seem to be enough for Irix 6.x.
>
> It may be that you are tripping over this bug in libsigsegv 2.5, but fixed
> in CVS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 8/17/2008 9:43 AM:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>>> At any rate, I'm still working on a patch that makes lib/signal.in.h add
>>> the #define for sa_sigaction if HAVE_SIGACTION &&
>>> !HAV
Eric Blake wrote:
> > At any rate, I'm still working on a patch that makes lib/signal.in.h add
> > the #define for sa_sigaction if HAVE_SIGACTION &&
> > !HAVE_STRUCT_SIGACTION_SA_SIGACTION. I'll post a snapshot for you to try
> > once I get it comp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Eric Blake on 8/15/2008 10:15 PM:
> At any rate, I'm still working on a patch that makes lib/signal.in.h add
> the #define for sa_sigaction if HAVE_SIGACTION &&
> !HAVE_STRUCT_SIGACTION_SA_SIGACTION. I'll pos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Tom G. Christensen on 8/14/2008 9:03 AM:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 08:14:43PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> According to Tom G. Christensen on 8/13/2008 2:45 PM:
>>>> Weird. So Irix 5.3 has sigaction, but not sa_siga
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 08:14:43PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Tom G. Christensen on 8/13/2008 2:45 PM:
> >>Weird. So Irix 5.3 has sigaction, but not sa_sigaction? Can you please
> >>post the definition of struct sigaction from ?
> >>
> >
According to Tom G. Christensen on 8/13/2008 2:45 PM:
Weird. So Irix 5.3 has sigaction, but not sa_sigaction? Can you please
post the definition of struct sigaction from ?
From :
typedef struct sigaction {
int sa_flags; /* see below for values
