Hi
On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 7:20 AM Bruno Haible wrote:
> Mike Fulton wrote:
> > Yes - good point - this would not work if it was built in 31-bit
> addressing
> > mode, non-XPLINK. 64-bit is always XPLINK. That would be a good addition.
>
> OK, thanks for the confirmation. I pushed this change:
>
Mike Fulton wrote:
> Yes - good point - this would not work if it was built in 31-bit addressing
> mode, non-XPLINK. 64-bit is always XPLINK. That would be a good addition.
OK, thanks for the confirmation. I pushed this change:
2023-06-01 Bruno Haible
getprogname: Add support for ASC
Hi
Yes - good point - this would not work if it was built in 31-bit addressing
mode, non-XPLINK. 64-bit is always XPLINK. That would be a good addition.
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 5:17 AM Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> > In getprogname.c, there is a section of code delimited by
> >
> > # el
Hello Mike,
> In getprogname.c, there is a section of code delimited by
>
> # elif __MVS__
> ...
> #elif defined __sgi || defined __osf__
>
> I would like to request a patch so that code built in ASCII mode will
> operate correctly.
> Currently, the program name returned is always in EBCDIC. Thi
Hello,
In getprogname.c, there is a section of code delimited by
# elif __MVS__
...
#elif defined __sgi || defined __osf__
I would like to request a patch so that code built in ASCII mode will
operate correctly.
Currently, the program name returned is always in EBCDIC. This can be fixed
with the
