Paul Eggert CS.UCLA.EDU> writes:
>
> 2006-09-13 Paul Eggert cs.ucla.edu>
>
> * _fpending.c: Include unconditionally, since we no
> longer worry about uses that don't define HAVE_CONFIG_H.
Done likewise for the verror module. That leaves xasprintf, xstrndup, and
xvasprintf as
Hello Bruno,
* Bruno Haible wrote on Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 02:31:22PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > CVS Libtool's libltdl allows third-party user code to decide over the
> > naming of the config header file it may share with it (and whether to
> > use one)
> The only project I know of which u
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> CVS Libtool's libltdl allows third-party user code to decide over the
> naming of the config header file it may share with it (and whether to
> use one)
Gettextize doesn't allow this choice, when including intl/ as a subdirectory,
and I'm not aware that anybody complained
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Paul Eggert wrote on Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:41:51AM CEST:
>> Since nobody needs HAVE_CONFIG_H any more, [...]
>
> What makes you reach this conclusion (for third-party packages, not for
> some well-maintained GNU packages)?
I did a Google search "D
Paul Eggert wrote:
> Since nobody needs
> HAVE_CONFIG_H any more, I installed the following change into gnulib.
I did the same for these files.
2006-09-14 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* lib/allocsa.c: Include unconditionally.
* lib/asnprintf.c: Likewise.
* lib/aspr
Hello Paul,
* Paul Eggert wrote on Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:41:51AM CEST:
> Since nobody needs HAVE_CONFIG_H any more, [...]
What makes you reach this conclusion (for third-party packages, not for
some well-maintained GNU packages)? Why was there a need at one time
but not now?
> If this is a re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Paul Eggert on 9/13/2006 4:41 PM:
>
> If this is a real problem for anybody (which I think it won't be),
> we can define a new no-config-h module which reverses the change.
The only real problem I had was this typo, with the fix checked
