On 08/29/2013 01:37 AM, Or Goshen wrote:
> Removed the use of error() in spawn-pipe
>
> @@ -393,12 +394,12 @@
> create_pipe_bidi (const char *progname,
>const char *prog_path, char **prog_argv,
>bool null_stderr,
> - bool slave_process, bo
It's easier to see your patches if you use the git send-email command.
It has a long and horrible command line syntax so what people usually
do is wrap it up in a shell script.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Fedora Windows cross-compiler.
Removed the use of error() in spawn-pipe
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 08/28/2013 08:19 AM, Or Goshen wrote:
> > This patch will make the module usable from a library context, it will
> not
> > call error() unless specifically asked to.
> > Can you please apply it to t
On 08/28/2013 08:19 AM, Or Goshen wrote:
> This patch will make the module usable from a library context, it will not
> call error() unless specifically asked to.
> Can you please apply it to the trunk
That depends on whether the patch is deemed reasonable; and if
non-trivial, you may also need to
This patch will make the module usable from a library context, it will not
call error() unless specifically asked to.
Can you please apply it to the trunk and ask the maintainer to relicense to
LGPL ?
Thanks,
Or
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> [please don't top-post]
>
>
[please don't top-post]
On 08/26/2013 07:00 AM, Or Goshen wrote:
> Certainly changing this behavior and rewriting it so it will return with an
> error code instead of aborting would increase the usefulness of this module
> ?
> I'll be happy to provide a patch if that is the straw that keeps the
>
Certainly changing this behavior and rewriting it so it will return with an
error code instead of aborting would increase the usefulness of this module
?
I'll be happy to provide a patch if that is the straw that keeps the
maintainer from relaxing the license
Thanks,
Or
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at
On 08/26/2013 01:27 AM, Or Goshen wrote:
> hi,
>
> I would like to use the module spawn-pipe in a library called libguestfs to
> make it compileable under mingw. currently the library is using the
> fork/exec combination which doesnt compile under mingw (mingw doesnt
> support fork). spawn-pipe lo
hi,
I would like to use the module spawn-pipe in a library called libguestfs to
make it compileable under mingw. currently the library is using the
fork/exec combination which doesnt compile under mingw (mingw doesnt
support fork). spawn-pipe looks like a good replacement, however it is
licensed G
