Re: relaxing xnanosleep

2010-03-25 Thread Jim Meyering
Eric Blake wrote: > Right now, xnanosleep is GPL. But I don't see it calling exit() (which > is normally the reason why most x*() interfaces are GPL), and it would > be useful to use in libvirt. Any objections to relaxing the license to > LGPLv2+, including a technical reason I might be overlooki

Re: relaxing xnanosleep

2010-03-25 Thread Bruno Haible
Eric Blake wrote: > sigaction would also need relaxing from LGPLv3+ to LGPLv2+ Fine with me (regarding my contributions to lib/sigaction.c). Bruno

relaxing xnanosleep

2010-03-24 Thread Eric Blake
Right now, xnanosleep is GPL. But I don't see it calling exit() (which is normally the reason why most x*() interfaces are GPL), and it would be useful to use in libvirt. Any objections to relaxing the license to LGPLv2+, including a technical reason I might be overlooking? nanosleep and sigacti