Re: regex [was: M4 1.4.14 on AIX 7.1BETA]

2010-07-30 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 07/30/2010 04:17 PM, Eric Blake wrote: 7873eb96dregex: avoid new dead-code warning with gcc-4.6.0 It's really dead. 5a4965c01regex: Don't require alloca. This one looks more interesting on the surface. However, config.log shows HAVE_ALLOCA and HAVE_ALLOCA_H, so it doesn't affec

Re: regex [was: M4 1.4.14 on AIX 7.1BETA]

2010-07-30 Thread Eric Blake
On 07/29/2010 05:52 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> echo 'regexp(,^)' | src/m4 >> >> should output 0, not complain about memory failure. > > Ah I missed that upthread. Problem is, there's no other patch between > February 3 and today. > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git&a=search&h=HE

Re: regex [was: M4 1.4.14 on AIX 7.1BETA]

2010-07-29 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 01:03, Eric Blake wrote: > On 07/29/2010 11:19 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On 07/29/2010 07:10 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >>> On 07/29/2010 10:46 AM, Rainer Tammer wrote: *If I use M4 1.4.14.6-ffa0:* # ../src/m4 164.regexp ../src/m4:164.regexp:10: bad regular

Re: regex [was: M4 1.4.14 on AIX 7.1BETA]

2010-07-29 Thread Eric Blake
On 07/29/2010 11:19 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 07/29/2010 07:10 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >> On 07/29/2010 10:46 AM, Rainer Tammer wrote: >>> *If I use M4 1.4.14.6-ffa0:* >>> >>> # ../src/m4 164.regexp >>> ../src/m4:164.regexp:10: bad regular expression: `\<[a-z]\w+': Memory >>> exhausted >> >> ...a

Re: regex [was: M4 1.4.14 on AIX 7.1BETA]

2010-07-29 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 07/29/2010 07:10 PM, Eric Blake wrote: On 07/29/2010 10:46 AM, Rainer Tammer wrote: *If I use M4 1.4.14.6-ffa0:* # ../src/m4 164.regexp ../src/m4:164.regexp:10: bad regular expression: `\<[a-z]\w+': Memory exhausted ...and has since regressed. Looks like we have a suspect... commit 602e

Re: regex [was: M4 1.4.14 on AIX 7.1BETA]

2010-07-29 Thread Eric Blake
On 07/29/2010 10:46 AM, Rainer Tammer wrote: >>> + m4:stdin:4: bad regular expression: `^': Memory exhausted >> That's more than just the strtod test failing, > unfortunately yes, the older version was much better (in this way). >> and not the sort of thing >> I like to see. The gnulib regex code